| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Re the Regulation of Information (Services outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Bill ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Re the Regulation of Information (Services outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Bill
Re the Regulation of Information (Services outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Bill was a 1995 Irish Supreme Court case, which established that positive law is superior to natural law in the Irish constitutional order.
==Background==
Abortion is illegal in Ireland except where there is a credible threat to the life of the mother. This illegality was made a constitutional requirement upon the passing of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution. The Supreme Court held in SPUC v. Grogan that a corollary of this explicit constitutional prohibition was the fact that information and advertisements on abortion services, typically advertising services available in the United Kingdom, were banned.
In addition to the positive ban on abortion contained in Article 40.3.3, previous judgements of the Supreme Court have emphasised the importance of natural law in the Irish constitutional framework, based partly on the preamble to the Constitution which refers to the "Christian nature of the State". Previous ''dicta'' from McGee v. Attorney General, G. v. An Bord Uchtala and Norris v. Attorney General indicated that notwithstanding the explicit positive law constitutional ban on abortion, even if Article 40.3.3 were not there, the natural law enshrined in the Constitution would prohibit the legislature from legalising abortion.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Re the Regulation of Information (Services outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Bill」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|